| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Comparison of Modeling Approaches for Full-scale Nonlinear Viscous DampersViterbi School of Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089-2531, USA (haebum{at}usc.edu)
Viterbi School of Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089-2531, USA (haebum{at}usc.edu)
Viterbi School of Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089-2531, USA (haebum{at}usc.edu)
Viterbi School of Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089-2531, USA (haebum{at}usc.edu)
Viterbi School of Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089-2531, USA (haebum{at}usc.edu)
Dept. of Civil Engineering University of Patras GR-26500, Greece
Dept. of Civil Engineering University of California, Berkeley, California, USA A study is presented comparing several identification approaches, both parametric and nonparametric, for developing reduced-order nonlinear models of full-scale nonlinear viscous dampers commonly used with large flexible bridges. Such models are useful for incorporation into large-scale computational models, as well as for use as part of structural health monitoring studies based on vibration signature analysis. The paper reports the analysis results from a large collection of experimental tests on a 1112 kN (250 kip) orifice viscous damper under a wide range of frequency and amplitude oscillations. A simplified parametric design model is used in the parametric phase, as well as two different nonparametric methods: the Restoring Force Method, and artificial neural networks. The variations of model parameters with the excitation and response characteristics are investigated, and the relative accuracy and fidelity of the modeling approaches are compared and evaluated.
Key Words: Full-scale viscous damper nonlinear system parametric identification non-parametric identification structural health monitoring
Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 14, No. 1-2,
51-76 (2008) |
|||