|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 12, No. 12,
1407-1430 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077546306070593
Rebound, Slip, and Compliance in the Modeling and Analysis of Discrete Impacts in Legged Locomotion
Pedro Bergés
Robotics and Dynamic Systems Laboratory, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
Alan Bowling
Robotics and Dynamic Systems Laboratory, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA, abowling{at}nd.edu
An energy-based approach to analysis of the impact problem in three dimensional multi-legged robot locomotion is hereby presented. The goal is to combine rigid and deformable body approaches, which come together naturally in a work-energy framework. The rigid body approach is used to calculate the energy restituted after a foot impacts on the ground, and the ground and the foot are considered rigid bodies throughout the analysis. Then the flexible body approach is used to store the energy restituted to the system through the systems compliance. The proposed hybrid approach can predict both rebound and non-rebound conditions for an energetic coefficient of restitution greater than zero. Zero tangential velocity (i.e., zero slip) in the impacting end effectors can be also predicted, a condition known as sticking. The article presents a method for determining whether the level of compliance in the system at a given configuration is adequate to insure a no-slip, no-rebound impact, with a focus on leg design.
Key Words: Compliance impact leg rebound
References
- Alexander, R. M., 1997, "Invited editorial on interaction of leg stiffness and surface stiffness during human hopping," Journal of Applied Physiology 82(1), 13-14 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Alexander, R. M., Bennet, M., and Ker. R., 1986, "Mechanical properties and function of the paw pads of some mammals," Journal of Zoology 209(A), 405-419 .
- Baruh, H., 1999, Analytical Dynamics, 1st edition, McGraw-Hill .
- Batlle, J. A. and Condomines, A. B., 1991, "Rough collisions in multibody systems," Mechanism and Machine Theory 26, 565-577 .[CrossRef]
- Bergés, P. and Bowling A., 2005, "Impact forces in legged robot locomotion," In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (in press).
- Bhatt, V. and Koechling, J., 1995, "Partitioning the parameter space according to different behaviors during three-dimensional impacts," Transactions of the ASME 62(3), 2342-2348 .
- García-Reyero, J. M, 2000, PhD thesis: "Rough Body Collisions with Finite Tangential Stiffness," Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
- Gilardi, G. and Sharf, I., 2002, "Literature survey of contact dynamics modeling," Mechanism and Machine Theory 37, 1213-1239 .[CrossRef]
- Haug, E., 1986, "Dynamics of mechanical systems with Coulomb friction, stiction, impact and constraint addition-deletion-i: Theory," Mechanism and Machine Theory 21(5), 401-406 .
- Hurmuzlu, Y., 1998, "An energy based coefficient of restitution for planar impacts of slender bars with massive external surfaces," ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 65(4), 952-952 .
- Hurmuzlu, Y. and Marghitu, D. B., 1994, "Rigid body collisions of planar kinematic chains with multiple contact points," The International Journal of Robotics Research 13, 82-92 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kane, T. R., 1968, Dynamics, 1st edition, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Austin, TX .
- Keller, J. B., 1986, "Impact with friction," ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 53(1), 1-4 .
- Khatib, O. and Burdick J., 1987, "Optimization of dynamics in manipulator design: The operational space formulation," The International Journal of Robotics and Automation,2(2), 90-98 .
- Krauss, P. R., Kumar, V., and P. Dupont, 1998, "Analysis of frictional contacts for dynamic simulation," In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, pp. 976-981 .
- Lee, W. H. and Sanderson, A. C., 2002, "Impact effects of biped contact with the environment," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18(1), 32-41 .[CrossRef]
- Marghitu, D. B. and Hurmuzlu, Y., 1994, "Three-dimensional rigid body collisions with multiple contact points," ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 725-732 .
- Marhefka, D. W. and Orin, D. E., 1999, "Compliant contact model with nonlinear damping for simulation of robotic systems," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 29(6), 566-572 .
- Mirtich, B., 1998, "Rigid body contact: Collision detection to force computation," Presented at Workshop on Contact Analysis and Simulation at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, http://www.merl.com.
- Ohta, H., Yamakita, M., and Furuta, K., 1999, "From passive to active dynamic walking," In Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 4, pp. 3883-3885 .
- Pfister, J. and Eberhard, P., 2001, "Frictional contact of flexible and rigid bodies," Granular Matter 4, 25-36 .[CrossRef]
- Pimsarn, M. and Kazerounian, K., 2003, "Pseudo stiffness estimation, a highly efficient numerical method for force evaluation in contact problems," Engineering with Computers 19 85-91 .[CrossRef]
- Pratt, G. A., Williamson, M. M., Dillworth, P., Pratt, J., Ulland, K., and Wright, A.., 1995, "Stiffness isnt everything," In Proceedings the Fourth International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, pp. 253-262 .
- Ruina, A., Bertram, J. E., and Srinivasan, M., 2005, "A collisional model of the energetic cost of support work qualitatively explains leg sequencing in walking and galloping pseudo-elastic leg behavior in running and thewalktoruntransition," Journal of Theoretical Biology 237, 170-192 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schmiedeler, J. P. and Waldron, K. J., 2000, "Impact analysis as a design tool for the legs of mobile robots," in Advances in Robot Kinematics, J. Lenarcic and M. M. Stanisic, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA , pp. 129-136.
- Schmiedeler, J. P. and Waldron, K. J., 2002, "Leg stiffness and articulated leg design for dynamic locomotion," in Proceedings of the ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1105-1112 .
- Smith, C. E. and Liu, P.-P., 1991, "Coefficients of restitution," Journal of Applied Mechanics 59, 963-969 .
- Stoianovici, D. and Hurmuzlu, Y., 1996, "A critical study of the applicability of rigid body collision theory," ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 63(2), 307-316 .
- Stronge, W. J., 1991, "Friction in collisions: Resolution of a paradox," Journal of Applied Physics 69, 610-612 .[CrossRef]
- Stronge, W. J., 2000, Impact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK , pp. 173-200.
- Sugimoto, Y. and Osuka, K., 2002, "Stabilization of quasi-passive-dynamic-walking based on delayed feedback control," In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, pp. 803-808 .
- Tsujita, K., Kawakami, M., and Tsuchiya, K., 2004, "A study on optimal gait patter of a quadruped locomotion robot," In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 745-749 .
- Usherwood, J. R. and Bertram, J. E. A.,2003, "Understanding brachiation: Insight from a collisional perspective," Journal of Experimental Biology 206(10), 1631-1642 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zheng, Y.-F. and Hemami, H., 1984, "Impact effects of biped contact with the environment," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 14(3), 437-443 .

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|